[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CL compatibility question
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: CL compatibility question |
Date: |
07 May 2004 07:02:46 +0900 |
Joe Corneli <jcorneli@math.utexas.edu> writes:
> (defmacro defbashfun (name lambda &body body)
> `(defun ,name (&rest $@)
> (apply (lambda ,lambda ,@body) $@)))
...
> Why is this? Are there plans that would change this behavior in the
> future?
Use &rest, not &body (in CL, &body is really just &rest with a hint to
the pretty-printer).
-Miles
--
[|nurgle|] ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that
will make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth?
[iddt] nurg, that's the goal