[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coding system
Re: coding system
Mon, 26 May 2003 15:47:45 +0200
Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt)
address@hidden (Stein A. Stromme) writes:
> [lawrence mitchell]
> | Emacs thinks the buffer is an XML file. The XML spec states
> | that any XML document which does not explicitly specify its
> | coding system in its opening line. e.g.
> | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?> for latin-1 should
> | be taken to be encoded as UTF-8. As such, Emacs tries to do the
> | right thing, and ensure that the document is saved as UTF-8.
> | To avoid the questioning regarding the coding-system, either,
> | specify the coding-system in the <?xml ?> declaration, or save
> | the file as UTF-8.
> Thanks for the explanation. In reality, the file is automatically
> generated (by blogmax.el), so I'll have to go digging for the right
> Btw, is the time (and Emacs) ripe now for going utf-8 as default?
> What are the pros and cons? (Apologies if this is off-topic.)
In my experience it is fine, although I hear that there are some
issues with CJK. But I've been using UTF-8 as default for several
months now and I don't think I encountered real problems. Except maybe
(as I seem to recall) that my Gnus did not sent proper UTF-8 two or
three times, probably because of clashes with the encoding of the
message to which I replied (I don't quite remember); but I suspect
that I had even in this regard less problems than if I were using
Latin-n (with n > 1).
Besides the Latin-1 repertoire I mostly use "Greek and Coptic",
"Greek Extended", "General Punctuation" and now and then "Box
Drawing" and "Miscellaneous Symbols". I won't switch back, at least
not for my local files.
7 Prairial an 211 de la Révolution
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!