Re: Is this code correct in the GMPL implementation ?

[Andrew Makhorin]

On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 11:26 +0200, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Hello !
> 
> This is my fourth time trying to replace the actual TUPLE struct 
> representation https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/tree/new-tuple and
> I'm 
> struggling again in understand/rewrite some parts of the code,
> mainly 
> src/mpl/mpl3.c::saturate_set and other places.
> 
> I'm asking for help to try to fix/rewrite the missing pieces on it,
> I 
> hope that this changes once corrected would give a reduction in
> memory 
> usage and probably execution time for GMPL.
> 
> Thank you in advance for any help you can give !
> 
> Cheers !


Please note that using nanbox makes the code non-portable. 
The ANSI C Standard (ANSI/ISO 9899-1990 aka C89), which glpk conforms
to, says nothing about representation of floating-point objects.