[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Coproc within coproc supported?
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Coproc within coproc supported? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:42:52 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 11/18/22 6:21 PM, Tadeus Prastowo wrote:
If it does not require you much effort, may I know around which
version of Bash after 4.3.48 the spurious warning issue was fixed?
It was changed in late 2017 and first released in bash-5.0.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Coproc within coproc supported?, Tadeus Prastowo, 2022/11/16
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/11/16
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Chet Ramey, 2022/11/16
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/11/16
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Tadeus Prastowo, 2022/11/17
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Chet Ramey, 2022/11/17
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Tadeus Prastowo, 2022/11/18
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Chet Ramey, 2022/11/18
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Tadeus Prastowo, 2022/11/18
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: Coproc within coproc supported?, Tadeus Prastowo, 2022/11/22