[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Health] evaluation edition
From: |
Luis Falcon |
Subject: |
Re: [Health] evaluation edition |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:56:48 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130701 Icedove/17.0.7 |
Hi everyone
On 29/07/2013 06:28, ronald munjoma wrote:
> Hi Khay and Sebastián,
>
> On 27 July 2013 14:26, Khay Bagus <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have been facing a issue with gnuhealth these days.
>
> Lets say a patient enters the triage room. The doctor who sees him
> for the first time is Dr X. He sees that the patient has to do some
> lab tests. So the patient goes to the laboratory. Unfortunately some
> tests take 2 hours to be ready. So when the patient returns to the
> triage room, the doctors shift are changed. So the Dr Y opens a
> previous evaluation by Dr X edits it and saves it... By the end of
> then day we don't have a way to know wich doctor really saw the
> patient and who did what.
>
>
> Having searched deeper, Khay is referring to Multiple providers per
> single encounter and the need to document and connect providers and
> their roles to the encounter. I came across this OpenMRS design proposal
> for dealing with such a scenario [0]
I believe we face two different scenarios :
1) Multiple health professionals involved concurrently in a procedure
(surgery, evaluation ... )
2) A patient evaluation that spans over 2 or more health professionals
in a sequential manner.
For #1, we can use the model similar to the surgery, where we have
different roles (surgeon, primary care, anesthesits, ... )
For #2 I think the best way to go today is for the doctor that finishes
the shift will close that evaluation, and the next one will open a new
one, but each doctor should be responsible for the evaluation she or he
makes. You can also use the ambulatory or inpatient care that allows you
to follow up a case.
What do you think ?
Best,
>
> [0]
> https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/projects/Multiple+providers+per+encounter+%28Design+Page%29
>
> Regards
> Ronald
>
>
> Is there any way to correct it. Or is our patient flow that is not
> correct?
>
> Please Advise
>
> Dr Khaizer
>
> Tete Provincial Hospital
> Mozambique
>
> --
> ***********************************************************************
>
> Dr. Khaizer Bagus
> Médico Generalista
>
> Khaizer Bagus, MD
> General Practitioner
>
> Hospital Provincial de Tete
> Tete, Chingodzi
>
> Email: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> MSN: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> Skype name: khaybagus
>
> ************************************************************************
>
>
>
--
Luis Falcon
http://health.gnu.org