Re: [h5md-user] fix remaining imprecisions - particle position

[Felix Höfling]

Am 13.01.2014, 15:38 Uhr, schrieb Pierre de Buyl  
<address@hidden>:

> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:29:44PM +0100, Pierre de Buyl wrote:
> > I modestly propose that this issue remains for a later version. In the  
> > context
> > of a database with validated submissions, a criterion could also be  
> > imposed on
> > the H5MD version that is used.
>
> Conversely, the current version could be named "extended_SI" instead?

I have no preference (my suggestion was "physical"). As there is currently  
no other possibility for the attribute value, the choice of the identifier  
actually does not matter so much.

Felix