[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/FutureVision plan.txt

[Benja Fallenstein]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Branch:         
Changes by:     Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden>      03/11/08 12:53:19

Modified files:
        FutureVision   : plan.txt 

Log message:
        more plan

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/FutureVision/plan.txt.diff?tr1=1.1&tr2=1.2&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/FutureVision/plan.txt
diff -u manuscripts/FutureVision/plan.txt:1.1 
manuscripts/FutureVision/plan.txt:1.2
--- manuscripts/FutureVision/plan.txt:1.1       Sat Nov  8 12:46:33 2003
+++ manuscripts/FutureVision/plan.txt   Sat Nov  8 12:53:19 2003
@@ -1,6 +1,38 @@
 
 What we need to do / change in the article.
 
+
+Small matters
+=============
+
+- Find Texas views refs and ref to them
+- In refs, rather than refering to FOHM as
+  canonical OHS, refer to Callimachus
+- XXX The references you give are
+  applicable, but aren't sufficient-- what do we do?
+
+
+Examples
+========
+
+XXX add example scenarios-- detail here which and how.
+Should be complete with giving their RDF structure &c
+so that people can see it's realizable.
+
+
+Changes in "tone" 
+=================
+
+(Go through whole paper and look for instances:)
+
+- Make it sound less like Ted speaking (according to reviewer)...
+- Say where we conject, give reasons for why we believe
+  our claims
+
+
+Discussion that needs to be added
+=================================
+
 - Relationship between items and documents:
 
   - Documents are items
@@ -76,3 +108,10 @@
     in realistic scenarios: The human user will be inclined
     to form sub-groups rather than munging hundreds of items
     in a big list.
+
+- Explain how to do re-contextualization: Reify the statement
+  (not necessarily using RDF reification! Just make a node
+  representing the relationship between two things)
+  and connect perspective to it
+
+