[Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hempp...

[Hermanni Hyytiälä]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/storm
Module name:    storm
Changes by:     Hermanni Hyytiälä <address@hidden>      03/06/05 05:12:22

Modified files:
        doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah: peg.rst 

Log message:
        Updates...

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/storm/storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst.diff?tr1=1.13&tr2=1.14&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst
diff -u storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst:1.13 
storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst:1.14
--- storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst:1.13      Thu Jun 
 5 04:38:09 2003
+++ storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst   Thu Jun  5 
05:12:22 2003
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
 
 :Authors:  Hermanni Hyytiälä
 :Date-Created: 2003-06-02
-:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/05 08:38:09 $
-:Revision: $Revision: 1.13 $
+:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/05 09:12:22 $
+:Revision: $Revision: 1.14 $
 :Status:   Incomplete
 
 .. :Stakeholders:
@@ -130,6 +130,33 @@
 ISSUE: 
  
    Do we want to keep GISP or move to Kademlia or some other?
+   
+   RESOLVED:
+   
+   I think we can use GISP as long as we do not deploy Storm
+   into a "production use", i.e., we use GISP more like a P2P 
+   testing platform for Storm rather than "the best and the final"
+   choice for Storm. 
+   
+   However, the problem is that how soon the deployment
+   will happen (I don't know anything about the milestones :)).
+   
+   Currently, I see Kademlia as the best alternative to us, but
+   as we just got finished a working Storm/GISP 
+   implementation, do we really want to move an another 
+   algorithm/protocol immediately ?
+   
+   OTOH, it's obvious that better and better P2P algorithms
+   are invented in the future. The question is that do we
+   want to wait those algorithms, or do we want to use
+   the algorithms which are currently available ?   
+   
+ISSUE:
+   
+   Do we want to implement currently available P2P lookup 
+   algorithm ourselves, or do we want to develop a novel 
+   P2P lookup algorithm ourselves ?      
+   
    
 Plan
 ====