[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:03:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.42.1 |
Am Freitag, dem 29.07.2022 um 11:40 -0400 schrieb Olivier Dion:
> Please try the following patch:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> diff --git a/gwl/processes.scm b/gwl/processes.scm
> index 2452d1f..4207f51 100644
> --- a/gwl/processes.scm
> +++ b/gwl/processes.scm
> @@ -197,12 +197,21 @@
> ((and (? string?) spec)
> (lookup-package spec))
> ((and (? valid-package?) pkg)
> + (set! (package-output pkg) "out")
> + pkg)
> + (((? valid-package? pkg) (? string? output))
> + (set! (package-output pkg) output)
Looking at the code for handling plain packages, that'd probably work,
but it raises more questions. Like "why is package-ouput a object-
property?" and "wouldn't this break if someone needed two different
outputs of the same package in a process or even anywhere in the
workflow?"
- GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/07/29
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Olivier Dion, 2022/07/29
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages,
Liliana Marie Prikler <=
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/07/30
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Olivier Dion, 2022/07/30
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/07/31
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Olivier Dion, 2022/07/31
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Olivier Dion, 2022/07/31
- Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages, Olivier Dion, 2022/07/31