[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gwl-devel] variable interpolation in code snippets
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: [gwl-devel] variable interpolation in code snippets |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:59:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>> It improves the readibilty.
>> However, does the keyword `list` is mandatory ?
>
> Unfortunately it is mandatory. Previously, I tried to give the record
> field a “smart constructor” that takes either one value (a list or a let
> binding resulting in a list) or — for convenience – multiple values that
> are then turned into a list.
>
> With the Guix-style records this does not seem to be possible. If we
> want to make this work we’d have to use our own extended records or
> maybe switch to GOOPS. GOOPS offers virtual slots that can have
> slot-ref and slot-set! procedures, which would handle the conversion
> transparently. I think this would be a good way forward — and it would
> decouple the GWL from the Guix version in use, because those extended
> record are really made for Guix and may not forever match the needs of
> the GWL.
We’re now using GOOPS for the <process> type. I implemented field
validation and implicit lists, so this is now possible:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
process: run-bash
package-inputs "bash"
data-inputs
. "a"
. #:awesome "b"
. "c"
procedure # bash {
echo "The name of this process: {{name}}."
echo "The most awesome of the data inputs is: {{data-inputs:awesome}}."
}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The dots are necessary to continue broken lines, but it’s also fine to
put everything on one line:
data-inputs "a" #:awesome "b" "c"
With a reader option we could shave off one more character from the
keyword syntax and use this instead:
data-inputs "a" :awesome "b" "c"
Lists are still valid, of course, they are just optional:
data-inputs : list "a" :awesome "b" "c"
or
data-inputs
list "a" :awesome "b" "c"
--
Ricardo