guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#74549] News entry for the survey


From: John Kehayias
Subject: [bug#74549] News entry for the survey
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:26:13 +0000

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 01:46 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 04:41:16PM +0900, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Maxim,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 01:41 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm a bit surprised by the need of a news entry for this; I'd typically
>> >> consider only news that impact users, or at least the software that Guix
>> >> constitutes, as news worthy :-).  I wouldn't like the news channel to
>> >> become some place where more "random" things get advertised, such as
>> >> venues and what not.
>> >>
>> >> I'd prefer if this was kept to other communication channels, suchas the
>> >> help-guix mailing list or the #guix IRC channel.
>> >>
>> >> My 2 cents!
>> >
>> > Apologies for perhaps rushing this. I should have asked around and
>> > gotten some consensus before such a change to how we use news. While I
>> > do think it can be useful for such a thing, I do agree that this
>> > probably leads to an erosion of the intended purpose of guix pull
>> > --news now that I think more about it.
>>
>> Perhaps I was a bit slow to answer -- I have a steady stream of messages
>> to attend to.
>>

No worries. As do I, which is why I hadn't raised earlier, as I should
have.

>> > Does it make sense to revert it (how does that end up working for
>> > news)? I can revert with a note to keep news more directly
>> > software-related, lest it sets a precedent. Though maybe this should
>> > be opened up to wider discussion.
>>
>> I don't foresee a problem with reverting a news entry; people pulling to
>> a commit before the reversal will see the news, those to a commit
>> including it shouldn't see it.
>>
>> It's not a big deal, but in order to not set a precedent, I'd rather see
>> it reverted.  I've answered the survey, by the way!
>
> I think we can wait until after the deadline ends to revert it, as long
> as it's already there.

Sounds good. I'll revert by Monday, noting in the commit message why
and as notice for what news.scm should be used for.

Thanks for the understanding!

John






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]