[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#62298] [PATCH v2 1/8] services: configuration: Add user-defined san
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
[bug#62298] [PATCH v2 1/8] services: configuration: Add user-defined sanitizer support. |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:03:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.0 |
Am Freitag, dem 24.03.2023 um 10:25 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> > + ((proc) ; TODO: deprecated, to be removed
> > + (every (cut eq? <> #f)
> > + (map maybe-value-set?
> > + (list sanitizer* serializer*)))
>
> This 'every' call result is not acted upon. Was it supposed to raise
> a syntax violation? If it's useful to keep it (and act on it), I'd
> use something like:
If I read this correctly, this 'every' call is actually in a guard
position, that is the syntax-case will ignore proc unless
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (null? (filter-map maybe-value-set? (list sanitizer* serializer*)))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I think your guard is the fancier one, though, and should be preferred.
>
Cheers
- [bug#62298] [PATCH v2 8/8] services: mympd: Use user-account (resp. user-group) for user (resp. group) fields., (continued)
[bug#62298] [PATCH v2 7/8] services: mpd: Use user-account (resp. user-group) for user (resp. group) fields., Bruno Victal, 2023/03/23
[bug#62298] [PATCH v2 5/8] services: mpd: Fix unintentional API breakage for mixer-type field., Bruno Victal, 2023/03/23
[bug#62298] [PATCH v2 1/8] services: configuration: Add user-defined sanitizer support., Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/23
[bug#62298] [PATCH v2 1/8] services: configuration: Add user-defined sanitizer support., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/24
[bug#62298] [PATCH v3 1/5] services: configuration: Add user-defined sanitizer support., Bruno Victal, 2023/03/24
[bug#62298] [PATCH v4 1/5] services: configuration: Add user-defined sanitizer support., Bruno Victal, 2023/03/26