guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#57963] [PATCH v5 2/2] home: services: Support user's fontconfig con


From: Liliana Marie Prikler
Subject: [bug#57963] [PATCH v5 2/2] home: services: Support user's fontconfig configuration.
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 07:45:34 +0100
User-agent: Evolution 3.46.0

Am Mittwoch, dem 02.11.2022 um 10:43 +0900 schrieb Taiju HIGASHI:
> Hi,
> 
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 27.10.2022 um 14:31 +0900 schrieb Taiju HIGASHI:
> > > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 27.10.2022 um 13:00 +0900 schrieb Taiju
> > > > HIGASHI:
> > > > > Sorry for the long time it has taken to resolve the issue.
> > > > > What do you think about it?
> > > > Putting the discussion with Declan aside, the last thing
> > > > mentioned
> > > > was
> > > > not trying to mix SXML and XML-in-strings.  Ludo offered the
> > > > solutions:
> > > > 1. Taking a <fontconfig-configuration> or a file-like object
> > > > 2. (Optionally) using a gexp-compiler for the former
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the lack of clarity.
> > > I had sent you a past email confirming that the direction of the
> > > implementation was correct and was waiting for your response.
> > > 
> > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57963#239
> > Ahh, I missed that.  If you pull in the XML declarations and the
> > <fontconfig></fontconfig> stuff to the serialization, you should
> > basically have most of what you'd need for a G-Exp compiler, but
> > even
> > if not it'd simplify this to
> > 
> > (match
> >   ((? home-font-config-configuration? config)
> >    (serialize-... config ...))
> >   ((? file-like? config) config))
> > 
> > Not sure if a match for type-checking would be needed since it's
> > already taken care of elsewhere, so writing it just in case.
> > 
> > Cheers
> 
> Sorry for my response delay.
> Is my recognition correct?  I have plan to rewrite it as below.
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (define (serialize-fontconfig-configuration config)
>   (define start-of-fontconfig "<?xml version='1.0'?>
> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'>
> <fontconfig>")
> 
>   (define end-of-fontconfig "</fontconfig>\n")
> 
>   (mixed-text-file
>    "fonts.conf"
>    start-of-fontconfig
>    (serialize-configuration config home-fontconfig-configuration-
> fields)
>    end-of-fontconfig))
> 
> (define (add-fontconfig-config-file user-config)
>   `(("fontconfig/fonts.conf"
>      ,(match user-config
>           ((? home-fontconfig-configuration? user-config)
>            (serialize-fontconfig-configuration user-config))
>         ((? file-like? user-config) user-config)))))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
More or less.  For one, I don't think start-of-fontconfig and end-of-
fontconfig need to be declared.  The (serialize-configuration ) call is
a little opaque atm, but let's suppose it returns properly formatted
XML.  Finally, as hinted already and since you're returning a file-like
object anyway, you may want to make this serializer a gexp-compiler
instead.

Cheers





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]