[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#55751] [PATCH 0/8] Towards reproducible openjdk
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
[bug#55751] [PATCH 0/8] Towards reproducible openjdk |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jun 2022 15:20:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
dannym@scratchpost.org schreef op wo 01-06-2022 om 14:57 [+0200]:
> From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
>
> This patchseries improves the reproducibility of openjdk.
>
> After it:
> * openjdk9 is reproducible.
> * openjdk10 has only a few non-reproducible parts.
> * openjdk11 has a number of non-reproducible parts.
> * openjdk12's "doc" output is still not reproducible ("Generated by javadoc"
> comment with timestamp in it)
> * openjdk13 still has non-reproducible parts (jmod, modules, classes.jsa,
> src.zip)
> * openjdk14 still has very few non-reproducible parts (jmod, modules,
> classes.jsa)
> * openjdk15 still has a number of non-reproducible parts (diz files only).
> * openjdk16 still has one non-reproducible part (classes*.jsa)
Now we are rebuilding everything Java anyway, could this be followed by
a patch removing the input labels and removing trailing #t?
Greetings,
Maxime.
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 1/8] gnu: openjdk9: Make build reproducible., (continued)
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 1/8] gnu: openjdk9: Make build reproducible., dannym, 2022/06/01
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 3/8] gnu: openjdk11: Make more reproducible., dannym, 2022/06/01
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 7/8] gnu: openjdk15: Make reproducible., dannym, 2022/06/01
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 6/8] gnu: openjdk14: Make reproducible., dannym, 2022/06/01
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 4/8] gnu: openjdk12: Make reproducible., dannym, 2022/06/01
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 8/8] gnu: openjdk16: Make reproducible., dannym, 2022/06/01
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 2/8] gnu: openjdk10: Make more reproducible., dannym, 2022/06/01
- [bug#55751] [PATCH 0/8] Towards reproducible openjdk,
Maxime Devos <=