bug#49425: [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Prompt for configuring substitutes discovery.

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> +# Configure substitute discovery according to user's preferences.
>> +# $1 is the installed service file to edit.
>> +configure_substitute_discovery() {
>> +if grep -q -- '--discover=no' "$1" && \
>> +        prompt_yes_no "Would you like to enable automatic substitute \
>> +discovery? (yes/no)"; then
>> +    sed -i 's/--discover=no/--discover=yes/' "$1"
>> +fi
>> +}
>
> Indentation is off, compared to the other functions.

Good catch.

> Should the message say a bit more, similar to that in (gnu installer
> newt substitutes)?
>
> Otherwise LGTM!

I went with:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
-if grep -q -- '--discover=no' "$1" && \
-        prompt_yes_no "Would you like to enable automatic substitute \
-discovery? (yes/no)"; then
-    sed -i 's/--discover=no/--discover=yes/' "$1"
-fi
+    if grep -q -- '--discover=no' "$1" && \
+            prompt_yes_no "Would you like the Guix daemon to automatically \
+discover substitute servers on the local network? (yes/no)"; then
+        sed -i 's/--discover=no/--discover=yes/' "$1"
+    fi
 }
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and pushed as commit 4cbe0127a6.

> Note that someone running “yes | ./guix-install.sh” will now have
> substitutes enabled (whereas it’s off by default in
> <guix-configuration>).  I suppose that’s fine though.

I think it's OK too.  I like to think that someone typing yes |
./guix-install.sh wants the most complete setup, with all the bells and
whistles ("yes, all that" :-)).

Thanks!

Maxim