guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#47539]


From: Xinglu Chen
Subject: [bug#47539]
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:11:53 +0200

On Mon, Jun 07 2021, Xinglu Chen wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 06 2021, Leo Famulari wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 09:16:36PM +0200, Xinglu Chen wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 21 2021, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>> > I notice that (most of?) the new packages use native-inputs for their
>>> > dependencies.
>>> >
>>> > If these dependencies are used at run-time, I would propagate them
>>> > instead. This way, they will be available in the build environment of
>>> > packages that depend on the package that is using them, which matters
>>> > for our go-build-system, where everything is built from scratch in each
>>> > package. If I remember correctly, that is...
>>> 
>>> I am not familiar with the Go ecosystem, is there a way to tell if a
>>> dependency is used at runtime?
>>
>> If foo requires bar, and baz depends on foo, then bar needs to be
>> available when building baz. That is because foo will be rebuilt while
>> building baz.
>>
>> We must either propagate bar from foo, or make baz depend on it.
>> Technically, bar is a dependency of foo, so it is correct to propagate
>> it from foo.
>
> So if A dependes on B which depends on C, and I want to build A, then C
> has to be a ‘propagated-input’ for B?  Did I get that right?
>
> But if I just want to build B, should C still be a ‘propagated-input’
> for B?

Since a new version of the ‘github-cli’ package is out, I ran
‘./pre-inst-env guix import go -r github.com/cli/cli’ to see if it had
any new dependencies.  I noticed that the Go importer put all the
dependencies as ‘propagated-input’ instead of ‘native-input’ (which it
did before).

My guess is that basically everything should be propagated?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]