[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#45692] ZFS on Guix, again
From: |
宋文武 |
Subject: |
[bug#45692] ZFS on Guix, again |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:44:34 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework@protonmail.com> writes:
> Hi guix-devel,
>
> I had some questions on the big ZFS guix bugpatches a week ago, and
> did not find any response, so I am back here pestering everyone.
Hello, thank you for working on ZFS for guix!
>
> [...]
> There are two alternatives:
>
> * Go with what I already proposed which I think is more general-purpose and
> cleaner (there is a separate service type that accepts symbols, and a
> separate service type that accepts `<file-system>` records, and the latter
> just extends the former).
> * Don't make a separate service type, but now we need to add some kind of
> `fstab?` field to `file-system` so that the ZFS shepherd service that mounts
> ZFS file systems will not be included in the `/etc/fstab`.
>
> I think overall that having lots of tiny service types that are then
> combined together fits the functional design of Guix better. So I
> would strongly propose my original design rather than hacks on top of
> `file-system-service-type`.
Well, I think the 'file-system-service-type' should handle all file
systems related configurations, but my opion is not strong. Waiting
ludo to decide...
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug#45692] ZFS on Guix, again,
宋文武 <=