[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#43976] [PATCH] Chicken build system + some example eggs
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#43976] [PATCH] Chicken build system + some example eggs |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:09:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi raingloom!
raingloom <raingloom@riseup.net> skribis:
> From 2ba52705cf909590a428ea598dfdf1c61ada6a8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: raingloom <raingloom@riseup.net>
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:11:59 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 01/20] gnu: Added search paths for Chicken Scheme.
>
> * gnu/packages/chicken.scm (chicken): Added search paths
> [native-search-paths]: added CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH and a comment about
> CHICKEN_INCLUDE_PATH.
[...]
> + (native-search-paths
> + (list (search-path-specification
> + (variable "CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH")
> + ;; TODO extract binary version into a module level definition.
> + (files (list "var/lib/chicken/11")))))
> + ;; the use of this variable is unclear. the online docs don't even
> + ;; mention it. i'm leaving it in as a comment for now, in case
> + ;; something breaks.
> + ;; (search-path-specification
> + ;; (variable "CHICKEN_INCLUDE_PATH")
> + ;; (files '("share")))
I think you can remove the comment here; presumably we now know that
CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH is the one that matters. :-)
Could you please ensure that earlier comments notably at
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43976#1> have been taken into account, that
the SRFI packages still build and have a layout consistent with the
var/lib/chicken/11 search path above, and send a v2 of the whole series?
Thanks in advance!
Ludo’.