[bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> skribis:

> Am 22.07.20 um 12:38 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Hartmut, it looks like there are cases like this where python-coverage
>> is used as a library and thus should not be in ‘native-inputs’.  Should
>> we remove it from the list?
>
> This depends on whether you see "guix lint" as a helper or an enforcer -
> and on how one classifies this package.

The message is “python-coverage should probably be a native input”.
That suggests it’s unlikely (but not impossible) to be a false positive.

To me, we should keep python-coverage in the list only if we know it
should be a native input 90% of the time.

Tanguy, Hartmut, do you have an estimate here?  :-)

Adding a package property to instruct ‘guix lint’ to ignore the issue
would also work, as Tanguy proposed.

Ludo’.