[bug#40492] [PATCH] gnu: Add meshlab

[Ludovic Courtès]

Saluton,

Did you have a change to look into this?

Thanks,
Ludo'.

Ekaitz Zarraga <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Sunday, April 26, 2020 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Saluton!
>>
>> Ekaitz Zarraga address@hidden skribis:
>>
>> > From 814e44cb90b1427a9af5d6a66392c5a39910e8fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Ekaitz Zarraga address@hidden
>> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:56:06 +0200
>> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add meshlab.
>> >
>> >     * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (meshlab): New variable.
>> >
>>
>> Great! I added a copyright line for you, fixed up indentation (see the
>> bit in the manual for how to do that automatically), and added a
>> comment—patch attached.
>>
>> It built for me, but then I realized I had missed something: the
>> external/ sub-directory contains lots of bundled copies of external
>> tools, and indeed, the ‘configure’ phase shows:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> -- Could NOT find Lib3ds (missing: LIB3DS_INCLUDE_DIR LIB3DS_LIBRARY)
>> -- Could NOT find GMP (missing: GMP_INCLUDE_DIR GMP_LIBRARY)
>> -- Could NOT find muparser (missing: MUPARSER_INCLUDE_DIR MUPARSER_LIBRARY)
>> -- Could NOT find OpenCTM (missing: OPENCTM_INCLUDE_DIR OPENCTM_LIBRARY)
>> -- Could NOT find Qhull (missing: QHULL_qhull_LIBRARY 
>> QHULL_qhull_INCLUDE_DIR qhull)
>> -- Found OpenMP_C: -fopenmp (found version "4.5")
>> -- Found OpenMP_CXX: -fopenmp (found version "4.5")
>> -- Found OpenMP: TRUE (found version "4.5")
>> -- - jhead - using bundled source
>> -- - glew - using bundled source
>> -- - Eigen - using bundled source
>> -- - newuoa - using bundled source
>> -- - levmar - using bundled source
>> -- - lib3ds - using bundled source
>> -- - muparser - using bundled source
>> -- - OpenCTM - using bundled source
>> -- - structure-synth - using bundled source
>> -- - qhull - using bundled source
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Some of these are already packaged, so it should be a matter of adding
>> them to ‘inputs’. For the remaining ones, it would be extra packaging
>> work to do.
>>
>> The goal is to address all of these, but if we can address the majority
>> of these, perhaps we can commit a first version of the package with a
>> FIXME stating what remains to be done, if you prefer.
>>
>> Thanks, and apologies for overlooking it before!
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> Hi,
>
> No worries, I'll try to take a look to those.
>
> We can push it with the Fixme and I'll go adding those during these days when 
> I'm free.
>
> Thanks!
>
> PS: Should I push those to the same file under engineering? or should I 
> create a new file for meshlab and add all its dependencies there too?