[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40680: [PATCH] service: sddm: Have sddm-service-type conflict with o
bug#40680: [PATCH] service: sddm: Have sddm-service-type conflict with other display managers.
Sun, 19 Apr 2020 09:07:29 +0300
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 01:33:07AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:00:49PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> > --- a/gnu/services/sddm.scm
> >> > +++ b/gnu/services/sddm.scm
> >> > @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ Relogin=" (if
> >> > (sddm-configuration-relogin? config)
> >> > (documentation "SDDM display manager.")
> >> > (requirement '(user-processes))
> >> > (provision '(display-manager))
> >> > + (conflicts-with '(xorg-server))
> >> ‘conflicts-with’ doesn’t exist, right? :-)
> > I haven't tried it out for Guix services, but it exists for shepherd
> > services, according to the manual¹
> Right, it’s not available in Guix <shepherd-service>.
> However, simplify adding ‘xorg-server’ to ‘provision’ should have the
> desired effect: ‘guix system’ errors out if more than one service
> provides the same symbol.
> >> But yes, I think (provision '(xorg-server display-manager)) would be
> >> fine.
> >> Or we can even drop ‘display-manager’ since it’s not used anywhere else.
> > Normally I'd be skeptical about dropping it since people might expect it
> > if they're using sddm, but it'd probably be fine.
> Yeah, maybe it’s safer to keep it.
Sounds good. I put xorg-server first so it more closely matches with the
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
Description: PGP signature