guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#39762: [PATCH] gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211.


From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Subject: bug#39762: [PATCH] gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211.
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:49:52 +0100

Vincent,

Thanks for the update! I only recently (this year?) learnt of this readable alternative to /proc/cpuinfo. Glad to hear it's seeing more action.

Vincent Legoll 写道:
But in normal mode, output changed a lot, some separators changed from ":"
to "="

This was deliberate, for consistency:

 Wed Feb  5 2020 Todd Allen <address@hidden>
* cpuid.c: Changed mp_synth fields to use '=' separator instead of ':',
     like every other value.
* cpuid.c: Changed processor serial number to use '=' separator instead
     of ':', like every other value.

a lot of reported values, new things... This will probably break
any simplistic parsing of that output, if there is anything doing that in
guix...

No:

 ~ λ guix refresh -l cpuid
 No dependents other than itself: cpuid@20200116

It's possible there's something out there calling cpuid from $PATH, but…

Guixers, please advise how to proceed further.

…honestly, you're overthinking it. :-) There's a time to be cautious but bumping cpuid is probably not it.

Guix is exceptionally good at installing previous versions of packages for those who disagree. I've pushed your patch as 08fee94d0fd96ea2b40f9fec80dc3fa19e283019.

Subject: [PATCH] gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211. * gnu/packages/linux.scm
(cpuid): Update to 20200211.

Note that git expects an empty line (newline) between the commit summary and the body of the message:

 gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211.

 * gnu/packages/linux.scm (cpuid): Update to 20200211.

Thanks again,

T G-R

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]