[bug#38803] [PATCH] gnu: elfutils: Update to 0.178

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi Marius,

Sorry for the long delay in replying. At Guix Days now, so maybe
someone can help me with some of this :)

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:26:48PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >> Thank you for these improvements.  Could you submit the synopsis and
> >> description update separately?
> >
> > Sure. Split patch as attached.
> 
> Thanks!  The first patch did not apply for me, can you rebase on
> 'master'?

I think it already was. But reattached. If it gets mangled by one of
the mail systems you can also find it here:
https://code.wildebeest.org/git/user/mjw/guix/
on the elfutils-0.178 branch.

> Also, for the description, please use full sentences.  I.e. keep the
> 'This package provides a collection ...' and 'This includes ...' instead
> of 'A collection ...' and 'Includes ...'.

OK. Done. See attached patch.

> >> I worry about all the new inputs.  This patch effectively makes us
> >> unable to update all these inputs outside of the 'staging' or
> >> 'core-updates' cycles.
> >
> > I am not sure I follow. This is my first patch.  It simply adds some
> > inputs needed for a new client/server program added upstream in the
> > new version.
> 
> OK, thanks for clarifying.
> 
> >> What is the difference in 'guix size elfutils' with and without this
> >> patch?
> >
> > $ guix size elfutils
> > store item                                                       total    
> > self
> > /gnu/store/ahqgl4h89xqj695lgqvsaf6zh2nhy4pj-glibc-2.29              37.4    
> > 35.8  47.2%
> > /gnu/store/2plcy91lypnbbysb18ymnhaw3zwk8pg1-gcc-7.4.0-lib           70.0    
> > 32.6  43.0%
> > /gnu/store/w0c5bcygj73chk2f6h0g8zhzpm80p1a5-elfutils-0.176          75.8    
> >  3.2   4.2%
> > /gnu/store/cp72ncw4prnsga65n3pzll07hpsg524f-bash-static-5.0.7        1.6    
> >  1.6   2.1%
> > /gnu/store/29jhbbg1hf557x8j53f9sxd9imlmf02a-bash-minimal-5.0.7      38.4    
> >  1.0   1.4%
> > /gnu/store/lbip9isk25isymvnb159l115xnacb5j8-xz-5.2.4                72.0    
> >  0.9   1.2%
> > /gnu/store/l86azr7r3p5631wj3kk329jl1y1mpjgy-bzip2-1.0.6             71.5    
> >  0.4   0.5%
> > /gnu/store/qx7p7hiq90mi7r78hcr9cyskccy2j4bg-zlib-1.2.11             70.2    
> >  0.2   0.3%
> > total: 75.8 MiB
> >
> > $ ./pre-inst-env guix size elfutils
> > store item                                                       total    
> > self
> > /gnu/store/1mkkv2caiqbdbbd256c4dirfi4kwsacv-guile-2.2.6            123.9    
> > 44.4  22.7%
> > /gnu/store/352q0n1rrymfdk49mfr0cym3d8svz824-icu4c-64.2             108.6    
> > 37.5  19.2%
> > /gnu/store/ahqgl4h89xqj695lgqvsaf6zh2nhy4pj-glibc-2.29              37.4    
> > 35.8  18.3%
> > /gnu/store/2plcy91lypnbbysb18ymnhaw3zwk8pg1-gcc-7.4.0-lib           70.0    
> > 32.6  16.7%
> > /gnu/store/k2m4q2av9hw73hw2jx6qrxqdyh855398-openssl-1.1.1c          76.4    
> >  6.4   3.3%
> > /gnu/store/hfvz18igm68p5yz7z4asn6ph363blp1z-gnutls-3.6.9           130.6    
> >  5.1   2.6%
> > /gnu/store/slvjkd3brr6n554r2gk9djsjpm7l7xbs-bdb-5.3.28              74.4    
> >  4.4   2.2%
> > /gnu/store/4rs159kgsa0l1svi5vbvn86in7z28bpl-mit-krb5-1.17           75.3    
> >  4.3   2.2%
> > /gnu/store/bjxd9jzc560d6i3i35f5yy5mljk0ib6m-openldap-2.4.47        188.5    
> >  3.7   1.9%
> > /gnu/store/w8qacdh5fqrzn08wz3n43d0czi00c4c6-elfutils-0.178         195.8    
> >  3.6   1.9%
> > /gnu/store/y7qk8raalgvdnxcglvxa320cfxrjk1x6-gmp-6.1.2               72.6    
> >  2.6   1.3%
> > /gnu/store/nsikjxykcaqa0zjpfmkqd569bngbv5nl-libunistring-0.9.10     72.4    
> >  2.4   1.2%
> > /gnu/store/cp72ncw4prnsga65n3pzll07hpsg524f-bash-static-5.0.7        1.6    
> >  1.6   0.8%
> > /gnu/store/i1cqaixp79vd3qwnyj1ll10pq6skm2wk-pkg-config-0.29.2       71.3    
> >  1.3   0.7%
> > /gnu/store/3xs3dnc28p9fi8in7hkfcdx20incrdvq-libgc-7.6.12            71.9    
> >  1.2   0.6%
> > /gnu/store/29jhbbg1hf557x8j53f9sxd9imlmf02a-bash-minimal-5.0.7      38.4    
> >  1.0   0.5%
> > /gnu/store/4m8dlhrzis07787xznx73ang35c3lly1-curl-7.65.3            190.8    
> >  1.0   0.5%
> > /gnu/store/lbip9isk25isymvnb159l115xnacb5j8-xz-5.2.4                72.0    
> >  0.9   0.5%
> > /gnu/store/lvnybsygfd6gya6xbdv48g72lb0iqqzx-nettle-3.5.1            73.5    
> >  0.9   0.5%
> > /gnu/store/f8aljw2qhv3d1br9czn8v5afbgfdrxkg-cyrus-sasl-2.1.27       83.3    
> >  0.9   0.4%
> > /gnu/store/2792g0vczwsxnvqm9ja5g9hwvbrjlc4w-gdbm-1.18.1             70.7    
> >  0.7   0.4%
> > /gnu/store/bvpnq3alwbavyk4663j4p9x9hakxwc4d-libatomic-ops-7.6.10     0.7    
> >  0.7   0.4%
> > /gnu/store/33f8qhxa69dmd43yqdx3wq1b2hqjddgb-curl-7.65.3-doc          0.7    
> >  0.7   0.3%
> > /gnu/store/7gabmw9siqrz79slpi1f8i90v3w1638x-libidn2-2.2.0           72.8    
> >  0.5   0.2%
> > /gnu/store/l86azr7r3p5631wj3kk329jl1y1mpjgy-bzip2-1.0.6             71.5    
> >  0.4   0.2%
> > /gnu/store/zavdh2z5mwkakjf1v98x43w1hzjzxkhl-nghttp2-1.39.1-lib      70.4    
> >  0.4   0.2%
> > /gnu/store/qx7p7hiq90mi7r78hcr9cyskccy2j4bg-zlib-1.2.11             70.2    
> >  0.2   0.1%
> > /gnu/store/lwz8fygpmmsw6h8vrllr56p7ssi5qx33-libtasn1-4.14           70.2    
> >  0.2   0.1%
> > /gnu/store/zasz52va238yyaq68rjm8ljwl4ikij4p-libltdl-2.4.6           70.2    
> >  0.2   0.1%
> > /gnu/store/ain96mrdwqd4s9shdd3s7m4syp5icdx5-libffi-3.2.1            70.1    
> >  0.1   0.1%
> > total: 195.8 MiB
> 
> Oof, that is a *huge* difference.  Do you know where the extra
> references come from?

Yes. There is are a new network client and server integrated with
elfutils in 0.178. A new client library debuginfod-client.so which
depends on libcurl, which pulls in most of the other stuff. elfutils
libdw.so has a dependency on this, but it is dlopened when
available. So it isn't a hard dependency. In other distros
debuginfod-client is its own elfutils subpackage which is recommended,
but not required. It allows libdw.so to pull in separate debuginfo
files from the network when not locally installed (and an server URL
is configured). Then there is also a little server based on
libmicrohttpd and sqlite which is responsible for the other part of
the new inputs. Other distros put this also in a separate elfutils
subpackage.

> I.e. could we move libelf.so to its own output to
> lose some of the runtime dependencies?

Sure. That is what most distros do. Have a elfutils-libelf package
that provides just the libelf.so.

> Previously 'mesa' was using our other 'libelf' package, but I switched
> it to elfutils in commit 9b3b4c05a06bb8ef22350706b66043b5e93d8d66
> because that's what "everyone else" do.  Perhaps we should go back to
> that, thoughts?  Then we don't have to worry as much about the size of
> elfutils.

I would get rid of the other libelf. It has been dead upstream for
years. And last year the home page and upstream completely
disappeared. Replacing libelf with elfutils-libelf for guix globally
would make a lot of sense to me. I believe that is what most distros
do these days.

> >> Would it make sense to have a separate 'elfutils-minimal' for use in
> >> Mesa, and expose the debuginfod-enabled variant as a separate package?
> >> We could "hide" the minimal variant so that end users get the expected
> >> package.
> >
> > Sure. Other distros split elfutils into multiple packages. For example 
> > fedora has:
> >
> > %package libs
> > %package devel
> > %package devel-static
> > %package libelf
> > %package libelf-devel
> > %package libelf-devel-static
> > %package default-yama-scope
> > %package debuginfod-client
> > %package debuginfod-client-devel
> > %package debuginfod
> 
> Right.  It makes sense to do something similar for Guix if many packages
> end up needing elfutils at runtime.

I can do that. But it wouldn't change the inputs. The runtime
dependencies of libelf on its own would be reduced to just zlib and
gcclibs. The other libraries (without debuginfod-client) would just
add a couple more compression libraries as runtime dependencies
(although you realy want debuginfod-client also around so that it can
be dlopened). Same for the binaries minus debuginfod-find and
debuginfod. The debuginfod subpackage would be the only thing with
runtime dependencies on everything (including libmicrohttpd and
sqlite).

> > With the main elfutils package containing all binaries except for
> > debuginfod-find (the client) and debuginfod (the server). With
> > appropriate requires/recommends (I don't yet know how those work in
> > guix).
> 
> Guix does not have a notion of 'recommends'.  Each package is built with
> an exact set of inputs, and each build output is scanned for references
> to the inputs which are then stored as runtime dependencies.
> 
> There are talks about "parameterized packages", where you could apply
> some vetted transformation to the build procedure, but advertising
> optional runtime dependencies is an open question.

yeah. I don't actually like optional runtime dependencies. It is had
to explain to users why some installs do work out of the box and
others don't. So I would actually recommend debuginfod-client be a
hard runtime dependency whenever possible. It was mainly done for
other distros which did worry about bootstrapping.

I'll go ask around here how to create a minimal package to see if that
helps. Although it feels a bit odd. Upstream doesn't really support
building just a subset of the package (there are some dependencies
between the libraries and binaries which require things to be build
together).

Cheers,

Mark

0001-gnu-elfutils-Update-synopsis-and-description.patch
Description: Text Data