[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#37350] [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.

From: Brian Leung
Subject: [bug#37350] [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:59:10 +0200

Hi Ludo,

I've attached an alternate update, which updates from the current Guix's 0.1.0 to 0.4.2 instead of from 0.1.0 to 0.4.2-some-commit.

I feel like the update to the nonversioned tree is slightly preferable since of the seven commits where the nonversioned tree is ahead, five are bugfixes and/or small refactors, one is a Readme change, and only one is a feature addition. But I don't feel too strongly either way.


On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:

Brian Leung <address@hidden> skribis:

> From fcdecc8e29fb4654d44c842a7efd4f266dde47ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Brian Leung <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:46:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-interactive-align: Update to 0.4.2-1.e1308c8.
> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-interactive-align): Update to 0.4.2-1.e1308c8.

Should we wait for the next upstream release instead of using what looks
like an arbitrary commit?


Attachment: 0001-gnu-emacs-interactive-align-Update-to-0.4.2.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]