Hi swedebugia,
swedebugia <address@hidden> skribis:
>From 1ce83b0ceabac0260f6a9dc43d4df1cc75236aa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: swedebugia <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:06:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add bitcoin-abc.
* gnu/packages/finance.scm (bitcoin-abc): New variable.
[...]
+(define-public bitcoin-abc
+ ;; This is a fork of bitcoin-core and identical to upstream.
+ (package
+ (name "bitcoin-abc")
Since everything except ‘source’ is identical, I think we should write
it as:
(package
(inherit bitcoin-core)
…)
+ (synopsis "Bitcoin ABC peer-to-peer full node for the Bitcoin Cash
protocol")
+ (description
+ "Bitcoin Cash is a digital currency that enables instant payments to
anyone
+anywhere in the world. It uses peer-to-peer technology to operate without
+central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out
+collectively by the network. Bitcoin ABC is the reference implementation
+of the Bitcoin Cash protocol. This package provides the Bitcoin Cash command
+line client and a client based on Qt. This is a fork of bitcoin-core.")
Could you make the description a bit more specific to Bitcoin ABC?
Otherwise it’s hard to tell how it differs from bitcoin-core.