[bug#36162] [PATCH 0/4] Add 'remote-eval'

[Jakob L. Kreuze]

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> Tests are supposed to be deterministic, so as such, it makes sense for
> tests to be normal derivations, as is currently the case.

Makes sense. I actually hadn't realized that the Guix test suite (those
run with 'check' rather than 'check-system') were also derivations until
you mentioned it. It seems like looking at the implementation there
would give me a better idea of how to structure my tests.

> In that spirit, we should instead tweak <virtual-machine> so that we
> can instruct it to build an autonomous VM with its own store.

I like that idea. There's a 'system-qemu-image/shared-store-script', but
no 'system-qemu-image-script', so I'll have to take what I did for my
test suite experiments and turn it into something proper.

> OTOH, we could also have ‘container-eval’, similar to ‘remote-eval’,
> which would be useful for effectful code, such as code that needs to
> interact with the daemon. Food for thought!

'container' in the sense of 'guix environment' containers?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature