[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 28 May 2019 15:39:45 +0200
Note that I’m not sure it’s actually a good idea to exclude (all of) these
from the dependencies: They’re mostly bundled with ghc because they are used in
ghc build. As such, it might well be that future ghc versions switch out e.g.
“bytestring” for some alternate data structure, which would then require
all package definitions that currently silently depend on “bytestring”.
Should I include a patch to remove the explicitly packaged `ghc-text` and other
packages of this type?