[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#32256] [PATCH] gnu: Add nudoku.

From: Kei Kebreau
Subject: [bug#32256] [PATCH] gnu: Add nudoku.
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 03:44:13 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <address@hidden> writes:

> Kei,
> Just an aside on this important matter.
> Kei Kebreau wrote:
>>> +    (description "nudoku is a ncurses based sudoku game.")
>> I'd use "@code{nudoku}" here because it's the name of a program.
> While there's some precedent in Guix for using @code{} for marking up
> package names when they'll be used mainly in actual source code
> (e.g. @code{My::Perl::Module}), that's a specific case with a specific
> rationale.
> A more suitable tag here would be @command{}. However, there seems to
> be an informal(?) consensus not to use it when talking about the
> package as a whole/project, but only when referring to the actual
> command (binary) itself. Some descriptions don't follow that
> convention, though, so it's at best a grey area.
> I don't think programme names should be marked up all purdy just for
> being programmes.
> Kind regards,
> T G-R

Alright. Hopefully I'll pick up more on these hints as I read more
documentation source code.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]