guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#31955] [PATCH] gnu: rust: support build with glibc-2.27, update to


From: Nikolai Merinov
Subject: [bug#31955] [PATCH] gnu: rust: support build with glibc-2.27, update to 1.26.2
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 03:07:09 +0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Hi Danny,

In this case we should use "// ignore-test" comment as described in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.23.0/src/test/COMPILER_TESTS.md#ignoring-tests
 

I checked: build passed succesfully with this 2 patches applied on top
of b53a0c882d02ebc8fefc87faa6945cd90fe1d4ae commit.

Regards,
Nikolai

Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Nikolai,
>
> I get a test failure after I applied both patches and then invoke "guix 
> package -i rust".
>
> egrep 'starting phase|build-started' RR
> @ build-started
> /gnu/store/zbc701kksgw26g0ckzkhixvjrmqayrjb-rust-1.23.0.drv -
> x86_64-linux
> /var/log/guix/drvs/zb//c701kksgw26g0ckzkhixvjrmqayrjb-rust-1.23.0.drv.bz2
> starting phase `set-SOURCE-DATE-EPOCH'
> starting phase `set-paths'
> starting phase `install-locale'
> starting phase `unpack'
> starting phase `dont-build-native'
> starting phase `patch-tests'
> starting phase `patch-cargo-tests'
> starting phase `fix-mtime-bug'
> starting phase `set-env'
> starting phase `bootstrap'
> starting phase `patch-usr-bin-file'
> starting phase `patch-source-shebangs'
> starting phase `patch-cargo-checksums'
> starting phase `configure'
> starting phase `patch-generated-file-shebangs'
> starting phase `reset-timestamps-after-changes'
> starting phase `build'
> starting phase `check'
>
>
> failures:
>     [run-pass] run-pass/out-of-stack.rs
>
> The phase that should have patched this test out never ran.  I checked
> the source file, it doesn't have the "// ignore-test" part.
>
> I'll take a closer look later but can you check on your side too?
>
> (Also, what's the deal with those comment directives?  Isn't there #[ignore] 
> instead?)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]