[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#31342] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: services: Add Enlightenment desktop service
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#31342] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: services: Add Enlightenment desktop service. |
Date: |
Tue, 08 May 2018 15:24:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:49:43PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Perhaps enlightenment_ckpasswd needs a PAM entry as well, like
>> ‘screen-locker-service-type’ does?
>>
>
> I'm not sure, enlightenment's screen locker code was refactored in
> 0.22.2 so that it would behave identically on Linux and BSD, and I'm not
> sure that the BSDs use PAM, and it seems to with as-is.
If you confirm it works as-is, that’s fine!
>> > +(define* (enlightenment-desktop-service
>> > + #:key (config (enlightenment-desktop-configuration)))
>> > + "Return a service that adds the @code{enlightenment} package to the
>> > system
>> > +profile, and extends dbus with the ability for @code{efl} to generate
>> > +thumbnails and makes setuid the programs which enlightenment expects to
>> > have
>> > +their setuid bit set."
>> > + (service enlightenment-desktop-service-type config))
>>
>> Not needed! :-)
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ludo’.
>
> I looked at the xfce service especially, and it actually has the same
> fields and declarations as enlightenment.
Sounds good.
> I'd like to leave the option in place to add
> '(enlightenment-desktop-service)' to an OS-config since it is then
> identical to the other desktop services we have.
This style has been (informally, I admit) deprecated since we introduced
the ‘service’ form. The recommended way is to write:
(service enlightenment-service-type)
I agree it’s slightly more verbose, but it’s more “transparent.”
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[bug#31342] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: enlightenment: Fix setuid program locations., Ludovic Courtès, 2018/05/07