guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#30708] [PATCH] utils: Add helper method to list subdirectories.


From: Maxim Cournoyer
Subject: [bug#30708] [PATCH] utils: Add helper method to list subdirectories.
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 21:18:12 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

Hi Ludovic,

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> From b4b607800d770c4cf77f92c247276c368357e94f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Maxim Cournoyer <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:49:06 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] utils: Add helper method to list subdirectories.
>>
>> * guix/build/utils.scm (find-subdirectories): New procedure.
>> * tests/build-utils.scm: Rename module so that it can be used with Geiser.
>> (%test-dir-hierarchy): New variable.
>> (make-test-dir-hierarchy): New test procedure.
>> ("find-subdirectories"): New test.
>
> [...]
>
>> +(define* (find-subdirectories dir #:key fail-on-error?)
>> +  "Return the list of the immediate subdirectories of DIR."
>> +  ;; Strip the trailing '/' DIR is '/'.
>> +  (let ((dir (if (and (> 1 (string-length dir))
>> +                      (eq? (string-take-right dir 1) #\/))
>> +                 (string-drop-right dir 1)
>> +                 dir)))
>> +    (define (pred filename stat)
>> +      (and (eq? (stat:type stat) 'directory)
>> +           (string-match (string-append dir "/[^/]*$") filename)))
>> +    (find-files dir pred
>> +                #:directories? #t
>> +                #:fail-on-error? fail-on-error?)))
>
> ‘find-files’ recurses in subdirectories, so the above implementation is
> not as efficient as it could be.
>
> I would instead suggest using ‘scandir’ (or ‘file-system-fold’) from
> Guile’s (ice-9 ftw) module.

Thanks! See the new patched attached. The test still passes.

> That said… is this a common enough operation?

I'm using it in a forthcoming new Guix package (SuperCollider) where it
allows me to explicitly list the bundled dependencies that are to be
*kept* rather than the ones to be removed, as is more commonly done. Without a
list of the subdirectories the contrib/vendor/whatever bundled
libraries directory I would not be able to do the following:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
+             ;; The build system doesn't allow us to unbundle the
+             ;; following libraries.
+             (let* ((all-dirs (find-subdirectories "./external_libraries"))
+                    (keep-dirs '("nova-simd" "nova-tt" "hidapi" "TLSF-2.4.6"
+                                 "oscpack_1_1_0"))
+                    (remove-dirs
+                     (remove (lambda (x)
+                               (member (basename x) keep-dirs))
+                             all-dirs)))
+               (format #t "Removing bundled libraries: ~s\n" remove-dirs)
+               (for-each delete-file-recursively remove-dirs)))))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Although now that you've made me see the light (scandir), I could
rewrite the whole thing using:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
          (lambda _
             ;; The build system doesn't allow us to unbundle the following
             ;; libraries.
             (let ((keep-dirs '("nova-simd" "nova-tt" "hidapi" "TLSF-2.4.6"
                                "oscpack_1_1_0" "." "..")))
               (with-directory-excursion "./external_libraries"
                 (for-each
                  delete-file-recursively
                  (scandir "."
                           (lambda (x)
                             (and (eq? (stat:type (stat x)) 'directory)
                                  (not (member (basename x) keep-dirs))))))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

So, this patch can go to the recycle bin. Thanks! :)

Maxim





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]