[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#27394] [PATCH] gnu: tor: Add seccomp support.

From: ng0
Subject: [bug#27394] [PATCH] gnu: tor: Add seccomp support.
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:31:18 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:07:38 +0200, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

> Hi Rutger,
> Rutger Helling <address@hidden> skribis:
> > From 5e93733bba145ac3e3a3f39fb43f25ad7125fa2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Rutger Helling <address@hidden>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:15:17 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tor: Add seccomp support.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/tor.scm (tor)[inputs]: Add libseccomp.
> Applied, thanks.
> Do you think the GuixSD service should set “Sandbox 1” by default?  The
> Besides, the GuixSD service runs Tor in a container, but that doesn’t
> necessarily provide the same guarantees:
> <>.
> Ludo’.

As mentioned earlier in the thread: I don't think it should be default until we 
found it to be stable enough. I experienced several "sandbox violations" when 
this in the last days. Is this good? Is this bad? I had no chance to 
investigate this so far.
It also goes against torproject recommendations, as they consider sandbox 
(seccomp) in
tor to be an unstable + testing feature, disabled by default.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]