Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:

>> Over the years, consensus emerged that ‘core-updates’, as a branch where
>> we lump together all sorts of rebuild-the-world changes, is no longer
>> sustainable.
>
> So, uh, how should I sent patches for that?  Before, I was able to mark
> patches as intended for core-updates.  But since that branch is no more,
> what should I do?  Where should we, non-committers, who do not have a
> dedicated "focused" branch, send patches that cause a lot of rebuilds?

You can still mark them, but instead of using "core-updates" you'd use
whatever team the package relates to.

-- 
Ricardo