[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4. |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:32:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Felix,
Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:11 PM Maxim Cournoyer
> <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Until everybody has a good grasp of the new process, I think sticking to
>> the documented one may be best for now
>
> The bug was retitled 'core-updates' per your request. [1]
>
> I didn't mean to set a tone in the discussion and merely hoped to
> embrace—by mistake it turns out—an existing consensus. My apologies!
No problem, I was a bit out of touch with the recent achievements from
the Guix Days workshop. But yes, I think until these experiments are
settled in our reference manual, to ease our day to day collaboration we
can continue labeling our changes with the 'staging' or 'core-updates'
prefixes, as it help guards against mistakes :-).
--
Thanks,
Maxim
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., (continued)
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Leo Famulari, 2023/03/14
- Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/14
- Re: Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Efraim Flashner, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process, Andreas Enge, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Leo Famulari, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Christopher Baines, 2023/03/15
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Andreas Enge, 2023/03/15
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/15
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Felix Lechner, 2023/03/16
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.,
Maxim Cournoyer <=