[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2023 14:20:46 +0100 |
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 00:19, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
> In the longer run I also agree with (b). But I am not sure it will be easy
> to formulate a rule that captures well the intended policy and draws the
> line between "trivial", anybody can push any time, and "complex", where more
> opinions are needed, and maybe stages in between. It may be worth the trial.
I agree. How to find the right balance between no guard and too many
stones if not rocks crossing the path?
Cheers,
simon
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, (continued)
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/12
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/03/15
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/17
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Andreas Enge, 2023/03/10
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Andreas Enge, 2023/03/10
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches,
Simon Tournier <=
- Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Felix Lechner, 2023/03/07
Re: [bug#61894] [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Felix Lechner, 2023/03/01
Re: [bug#61894] [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/06