guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: guix lint false positives and RFC patch


From: Vagrant Cascadian
Subject: Re: guix lint false positives and RFC patch
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 15:24:38 -0700

On 2022-11-03, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-11-03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> skribis:
>>
>>> --- a/guix/lint.scm
>>> +++ b/guix/lint.scm
>>> @@ -313,7 +313,8 @@ (define (tests-explicitly-enabled?)
>>>        '()))
>>>  
>>>  (define (properly-starts-sentence? s)
>>> -  (string-match "^[(\"'`[:upper:][:digit:]]" s))
>>> +  (string-match "^[(\"'`[:upper:][:digit:]]"
>>> +                (string-replace-substring s "@code{" "")))
>>
>> An identifier in @code or file name in @file may legitimately start with
>> a lower-case letter so I don’t think we should try to prevent that.
>>
>> However, maybe we could change the regexp above to something that
>> accepts @ or some other non-letter character at the start?
>
> Great suggestion, as it is simpler, easier to read, and actually covers
> more false positives! Updated patch attached!
>
> I think there was only one case fixed by the @code{} check for the
> synopsis length check, and I don't see any obvious other @*{} checks
> that would currently improve anything, though it would be ideal to make
> it more future-proof just in case... though I think my attempt at that
> would be awfully ugly, help from others would be welcome!

Well, ugly is what I have... Found two packages affected by @acronym.

Also realized that it should leave the {} in the length-matching, as
they are typically replaced by other characters when rendered.


> That said, I think this resolves 52 false positives with guix lint (~10%
> of the 536 synopsis/description issues currently).

Think with this applied there are 54 false positives fixed.

live well,
  vagrant
From bfa13fdd3616839883e50efbbc05fb132610ce67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 19:56:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] guix: lint: Exclude some "@" symbols from various
 checks.

The visual representation of "@code{}" or similar in the description and
synopsis do not include the string, so exclude it from checks to avoid false
positives.

FIXME handle @command, @file, @acronym, etc.

* guix/linx.scm (properly-starts-sentence): Exclude leading "@".
  (check-synopsis-length): Exclude "@code" and "@acronym".
---
 guix/lint.scm | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/guix/lint.scm b/guix/lint.scm
index 8e3976171f..76b17b297d 100644
--- a/guix/lint.scm
+++ b/guix/lint.scm
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ (define (tests-explicitly-enabled?)
       '()))
 
 (define (properly-starts-sentence? s)
-  (string-match "^[(\"'`[:upper:][:digit:]]" s))
+  (string-match "^[@(\"'`[:upper:][:digit:]]" s))
 
 (define (starts-with-abbreviation? s)
   "Return #t if S starts with what looks like an abbreviation or acronym."
@@ -650,7 +650,10 @@ (define check-start-article
               '()))))
 
   (define (check-synopsis-length synopsis)
-    (if (>= (string-length synopsis) 80)
+    (if (>= (string-length (string-replace-substring
+                            (string-replace-substring synopsis "@acronym" "")
+                            "@code" ""))
+                           80)
         (list
          (make-warning package
                        (G_ "synopsis should be less than 80 characters long")
-- 
2.35.1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]