[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tricking peer review
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Tricking peer review |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:38:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Christine Lemmer-Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> skribis:
> Here's another way to think of it, borrowing from some ocap systems: the
> hash is the actual, canonical identifier of this package revision. The
> URL to get the package is merely a "hint" as to where to get it.
Yes, definitely. It remains we need to educate ourselves to not give
too much credit to this hint.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Re: Tricking peer review, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2021/10/20
patches for new packages proper workflow (Re: Tricking peer review), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2021/10/20
Re: Tricking peer review, Leo Famulari, 2021/10/20
Re: Tricking peer review, Christine Lemmer-Webber, 2021/10/25
- Re: Tricking peer review,
Ludovic Courtès <=