[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tricking peer review
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Tricking peer review |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:14:52 +0200 |
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 19:03, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:39:12AM +0200, zimoun wrote:
>> Drifting from the initial comment. One could name “tragic” commits are
>> commits which break “guix pull”. It is rare these days but there are
>> some reachable ones via “guix time-machine”.
>
> That's a good point. Is it a good idea to teach Guix to help (not force)
> users to avoid these commits?
Somehow, it means extend the mechanism behind
’channel-with-substitutes-available’ [1], I guess.
1: <https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Channels-with-Substitutes>
Cheers,
simon
- Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ryan Prior, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/18
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ryan Prior, 2021/10/18
- Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Re: Tricking peer review, Leo Famulari, 2021/10/20
- Re: Tricking peer review,
zimoun <=
Re: Tricking peer review, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2021/10/15
Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/18
Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/19
- Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Incentives for review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/19
- Re: Incentives for review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Re: Incentives for review, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/10/19
- Re: Incentives for review, Christine Lemmer-Webber, 2021/10/19