[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Discoverability at the REPL level
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
Re: Discoverability at the REPL level |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:03:51 +0100 |
zimoun 写道:
1. Does Guix want a system of aliases? For example, let the
script
“~/.config/guix/scripts/foo.scm“ and then ‘guix foo’.
I asked Guix and it said no, that's madness, sorry. I think I
agree.
Letting packages like Julien's excellent guix-home-manager[0]
extend guix is interesting (once it works[1] :-).
It feels natural enough and allows anyone on a ‘guix foo is
broken’ support call to ‘guix install guix-foo && guix foo’ with
little trouble.
Guix executing arbitrary scripts in ~/.config does neither.
I'm unconvinced there's a use case that justifies reinventing
shell aliases in Guix, in a heavy-weight fashion, while
simultaneously not being ‘worth’ a real Guixtension package.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]: https://framagit.org/tyreunom/guix-home-manager
[1]:
https://framagit.org/tyreunom/guix-home-manager#creating-the-first-home-generation
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature