[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2020 21:36:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello Tobias,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:
> Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer 写道:
>> I'd only agree to such a change if it's already been standardized in
>> the
>> RnRS as such
>
> Sure, I think that's implied. #true and #false are part of the
> R7RS-small standard.
Thanks, I couldn't find where that was defined. Now that you've pointed
it to me, it's defined in section 6.3 Booleans:
The standard boolean objects for true and false are written as #t and
#f. Alternatively, they can be written #true and #false,
respectively.
> I don't know what Guile ‘is’, but it supports that part of the
> standard. I don't think it implements any of the RnRS completely?
> I've heard it said that Guile targets R5RS, but that was ages ago.
info '(guile) Guile and Scheme' suggests it supports all of the R5RS,
R6RS or R7RS standards, plus a bunch of srfi modules.
With this cleared, I don't have an objection to the proposal, other than
the other points I've mentioned earlier (to recall those points: I don't
perceive much value in it and it'll make the 'git blame' output noisy).
Thanks,
Maxim
- Using #true and #false everywhere?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/10/16
- Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2020/10/16
- Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Andreas Enge, 2020/10/20
- Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/10/21
- Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Andreas Enge, 2020/10/21
- Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/10/21
- Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Roel Janssen, 2020/10/21
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Vagrant Cascadian, 2020/10/16
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Danny Milosavljevic, 2020/10/16