[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:52:32 +0200 |
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> I think there were several issues we discussed:
Allow me to reiterate, at the risk of bikeshedding... :)
> 1. We can only approximate that actual profile content; storing
> an approximate ‘manifest.scm’ along with the profile would IMO be
> deceptive.
Why is an approximate file more of a problem than a command producing
an approximate result? We could include a warning comment at the top of
the file to make it explicit that it's approximate.
> 2. It’s easy to maintain compatibility over a data format, but it’s
> much harder to maintain compatibility for code.
I'm confused: my suggestion is to add a new data format, so isn't it
better then?
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/11
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/13
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/14
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, zimoun, 2020/06/15
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/15
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/16
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/16
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, zimoun, 2020/06/16
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/16
- how to "guix pack" a profile?, zimoun, 2020/06/17
- Re: how to "guix pack" a profile?, elaexuotee, 2020/06/18
- Re: how to "guix pack" a profile?, zimoun, 2020/06/18