Re: Reducing LLVM closure size

guix-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reducing LLVM closure size

From:	Arun Isaac
Subject:	Re: Reducing LLVM closure size
Date:	Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:58:51 +0530

> Since LLVM is all over the place, _multiple_ versions of LLVM inevitably
> end up in anyone's graph.

Is it possible to build a full system completely avoiding LLVM and only
using GCC?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Reducing LLVM closure size, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/12
- Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Julien Lepiller, 2020/06/12
  - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Oliver Propst, 2020/06/12
  - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/12
    - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Julien Lepiller, 2020/06/12
    - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/12
- Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Arun Isaac <=
  - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/13
- Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/16
  - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/16
    - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Efraim Flashner, 2020/06/16
    - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/16
    - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/06/23
    - Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/28

Prev by Date: Re: (propagated) 'inputs' depends on 'outputs'?
Next by Date: Cuirass image download
Previous by thread: Re: Reducing LLVM closure size
Next by thread: Re: Reducing LLVM closure size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread