[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should guix track package aliases?
|
From: |
Vincent Legoll |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should guix track package aliases? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 May 2020 23:57:31 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 |
Hello,
On 25/05/2020 16:20, Josh Marshall wrote:
Checking out repology.org/repository/gnuguix
<http://repology.org/repository/gnuguix> , it got picked up and guix
looks like it is in much better shape.
Yay, but we're still far from the front page's top repositories...
But, to celebrate our come back into the fray, I've grabbed a few low
hanging fruits from the outdated and/or potentially vulnerable list.
Series incoming (on guix-patches, issue #41533)...
--
Vincent Legoll
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, (continued)
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Nikita Gillmann, 2020/05/10
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, zimoun, 2020/05/10
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Julien Lepiller, 2020/05/10
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, zimoun, 2020/05/10
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Josh Marshall, 2020/05/10
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Josh Marshall, 2020/05/24
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, zimoun, 2020/05/25
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Josh Marshall, 2020/05/25
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Nicolò Balzarotti, 2020/05/25
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Josh Marshall, 2020/05/25
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?,
Vincent Legoll <=
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Josh Marshall, 2020/05/25
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, zimoun, 2020/05/25
- Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Josh Marshall, 2020/05/25
Re: Should guix track package aliases?, Vincent Legoll, 2020/05/10