Re: Exact same 'call-with-temporary-directory' defined twice?

[zimoun]

Hi,

On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 23:53, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Naively: does it make sense to move it to "guix/build/utils.scm"?
>
> No because it depends on (guix build syscalls) for ‘mkdtemp!’ and
> there’s currently that assumption that (1) (guix build utils) can be
> used on a statically-linked Guile, and (2) it has no dependencies.

Thank you for the explanations.  I am not sure to understand the
assumption (1) but never mind.


Cheers,
simon