Re: [FONTS]: Media Type Specification Changed.

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice]

Raghav,

Raghav Gururajan 写道：
> Oh! How are you doing now? Let me know if you need anything. I 
> can try
> and help in any way plausible. :-)

Thanks!  I'm better than I've been, don't worry.

> That change has been discussed during review and was only merged 
> after I
> gave the fact of about fontconfig. :-)

All right!

> I understand. I should have mentioned in the log. But it was not 
> sneaky.

I tried to be very clear that I didn't actually think so.  Sorry 
if I failed.

> But yeah, I should add that to my workflow of making 
> comments/logs.

Sweet.

> Agreed! I do not like inconsistencies either. Please find the 
> patch
> attached with this email.

LGTM, apart from one nitpick.

Both /share/fonts/{true,open}type are extremely common on other 
distributions, while /share/fonts/webopen would be unique to Guix. 
The de facto ’standard’ for (the much newer) WOFF seems to be, 
well, /share/fonts/woff.  So despite my previous comments about 
avoiding acronyms, I'll keep the latter.  We can always revisit 
this later.

Applied as 7d426c5b0e27cc3e72c6e12e07b8c42055cedba0.  Thanks!

Kind regards,

T G-R

[0]:

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature