[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python 2 end-of-life?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Python 2 end-of-life? |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:43:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 |
zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
>> It would be a shame if half a dozen lines of python were pulling in
>> all that weight if it could have been a few lines of guile or bash instead.
>
> Do you propose to patch each time? Because I am not convinced again
> that upstream will change Python to Guile.
We have python-on-guile, which might just work as a replacement for
trivial uses of Python 2.
--
Ricardo
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, (continued)
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Bengt Richter, 2019/11/26
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/11/27
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, zimoun, 2019/11/27
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Bengt Richter, 2019/11/29
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/11/29
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, zimoun, 2019/11/29
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, zimoun, 2019/11/27
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Bengt Richter, 2019/11/29
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, zimoun, 2019/11/29
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/11/28
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/11/28
- Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, zimoun, 2019/11/28
Re: Python 2 end-of-life?, Alex Griffin, 2019/11/21