guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Replace Youtube-DL with HyperVideo


From: rain1
Subject: Re: Replace Youtube-DL with HyperVideo
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:39:10 +0100
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6

On 2019-08-07 10:02, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Am 05.08.19 um 20:56 schrieb Raghav Gururajan:
I came across this project called HyperVideo (https://libregit.org/heck
yel/hypervideo). It is a fork of Youtube-DL, without non-free JS and
SWF bytecode.

Huh? youtube-dl does not include any JS or SWF bytecode - so there is
nothing to remove.

And I just checked the diff, and there are not blobs removed (which is
what I would have expected). The only things changed are:

  * Signature decryption for youtube signatures is removed.
      o The JS bytecode interpreter is removed - which AFAIU is not a
complete interpreter, but only tried to fetch the calculated URL
        from the code.
      o The SWF bytecode interpreter is removed - which also AFAIU is
        not a complete interpreter.
  * The IqiyiSDKInterpreter removed in youtube_dl/extractor/iqiyi.py -
    theses seem to use some hard-coded authentication tokens for login
    at http://kylin.iqiyi.com/

I can't see why this would require to replace youttube-dl by hypervideo.

Hello

According to my analysis youtube-dl is libre software.

there was some confusion at some point because it was thought that it has a "javascript interpreter" and "executes non-free javascript downloaded from the youtube website". I put these in quotes because they are not really true. The "interpreter" is actually just a regex that strips out a certain snippet and an simple arithmetic expression evaluator, it doesn't handle much of javascript and it's very much below turing complete. It uses this to compute a key that's needed to access certain videos.

Here is my post about it on gnu-linux-libre https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2017-07/msg00000.html

I think the fork will divide our efforts and reduce our ability to cooperate with each other as a free software community. I don't recommend it.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]