Re: Rust = bust?

[John Soo]

Hi Swedebugia,

Hmm maybe the simplest workaround for a temporary hack would be to add #:tests 
#f to the arguments of the affected rust package definitions while you work on 
grin.  It will be great when rust substitutes are reliably available...

- John

> On Jun 30, 2019, at 12:12 PM, swedebugia <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I'm eager to begin building grin which relies on rust 1.34+ but I get this 
> from a guix checkout compiled yesterday:
> 
> The following derivations would be built:
>   /gnu/store/9d9r8c70yz329gl01ywgvf4gql9ir31f-grin-1.1.0.drv
>   /gnu/store/hgpjq9f5z6rpmidsij7nrp20ad38vg98-rust-1.35.0.drv
>   /gnu/store/1lmw4151bbz6b0scd2gvxsgh0ad25vwb-rust-1.34.1.drv
>   /gnu/store/cssgpdzm63zd8vdxr9pkhmplr5c0wglr-rust-1.33.0.drv
>   /gnu/store/ivkmn1gisdz3xys6gdmncr1vfpwp1a0v-rust-1.32.0.drv
>   /gnu/store/11b81ijyi1wnp41wgyqjwgxvg28hk4hg-rust-1.31.1.drv
>   /gnu/store/1yis5vsvqpf0gaynnfqpnin45yp3cw4l-rust-1.30.1.drv
> 
> This has not changed for days/a week.
> 
> When investigation on the CI I find that rust above 1.30 have not build on 
> master for x86-64 since april.
> 
> http://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=rust-1.30
> ->
> http://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1303680/details "dependency failed"
> 
> What does that mean?
> 
> What is going on?
> 
> Also could somebody tell me how to shut off the tests if I choose to build 
> them myself?
> -- 
> Cheers Swedebugia
>