Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp

[Ludovic Courtès]

Konrad Hinsen <address@hidden> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> (They could have chosen Guile instead of a custom Lisp, but that’s an
>> “implementation detail”.  :-))
>
> From my reading of the whitepaper, no. They have pretty strict
> constraints on their language because they send live code updates
> to running instances and want to be able to make certain guarantees.
> Guile, or any other Scheme, would be too flexible.

Oh right, I had overlooked that aspect of the project.  Interesting!

Ludo’.