[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden |
|
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:46:44 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:47:41PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I forgot to mention:
>
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'd hate to "strand" existing users who might not notice that they are
> > not receiving updates to the 'linux-4.1' package they've specified in
> > their GuixSD configuration.
>
> I think they could not fail to notice, because if we removed it, any
> attempt to build a system with linux-libre-4.1 would fail immediately.
Ah, right. I was thinking of `guix package -u .` for out-of-tree packages.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature